• The case before the court challenged the North Carolina general assembly’s freedom to amend the state constitution.
• It originated from amendments that enshrined the state’s voter ID law and capped the income tax.
• The court majority claimed legislators from “gerrymandered” districts should not be empowered to amend the state constitution.
• In dissent, Justice Phil Berger Jr. said the ruling violated the 14th amendment.

Tagged: Election Integrity